Livanje v S (378/2018) [2019] ZASCA 126; 2020 (2) SACR 451 (SCA) (27 September 2019)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
378/2018
Judges
Maya, Molemela, Dlodlo, Mbatha, Hughes
The Supreme Court of Appeal corrected a housebreaking conviction from intent to rob to intent to commit an unknown offence and resentenced the appellant to five years.
S v Rantsie (159/17) [2017] ZAGPPHC 872 (6 September 2017)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
159/17
Judge
J W Louw
The High Court reviewed a magistrate’s sentence for housebreaking and corrected an overly broad suspended-sentence condition that referred to any offense.
Kotze v S (776/2016) [2017] ZASCA 27 (27 March 2017)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
776/2016
Judges
Shongwe, Majiedt, Van der Merwe, Mocumie, Schippers
The Supreme Court of Appeal upheld a conviction for housebreaking with intent to commit indecent assault and indecent assault, finding the complainant’s identification reliable.
Makier v S (A559/2010) [2011] ZAWCHC 170 (11 March 2011)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A559/2010
Judges
Louw, Fortuin
The court found that while the circumstantial evidence established the appellant's guilt for both housebreaking with intent to murder and murder, it did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that the murder was premeditated as required by the minimum sentencing legislation. The evidence did not support the conclusion that the appellant planned the killing in advance. The prescribed sentence of life imprisonment was therefore not mandatory. Considering the appellant's personal circumstances, emotional instability, and time already spent in custody, the court held that a sentence of 25 years' impri…
S V Niekerk and Another (61/06) [2006] ZANCHC 86 (28 April 2006)
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
61/06
Judges
SA Majiedt, PL Tlaletsi
On special review, the High Court set aside convictions and sentences after holding that trespassing was not a competent verdict on a charge of housebreaking with intent to steal.
S v Khundulu and Another (127/90) [1991] ZASCA 15; [1991] 2 All SA 113 (A) (18 March 1991)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
127/90
Judges
Hoexter, Milne, Krieger
The court found that the appellants, together with a third accused, had jointly planned and executed a housebreaking with intent to rob and murder the Palvies. The evidence established that the plan was premeditated, and the appellants acted in concert, sharing a common purpose to commit robbery and murder. The court rejected the argument that there was no agreement to murder at the time of the first break-in, finding that the entire enterprise was methodically orchestrated and that the appellants foresaw the possibility of death resulting from their actions. The court held that the requireme…