He and She Investments (Pty) Ltd v Brand NO and Others; He and She Investments v Brand NO and Others (23198/18; 23199/18)
He and She Investments (Pty) Ltd v Brand NO and Others; He and She Investments v Brand NO and Others (23198/18; 23199/18) [2019] ZAWCHC 15; 2019 (5) SA 492 (WCC) (26 February 2019)
The court found that the respondents failed to disclose a bona fide and legally sufficient defence to resist summary judgment. Their affidavits lacked particularity and completeness, failing to provide material facts regarding the alleged agreements, use of funds, and the basis for their defences. The purported agreement to misappropriate funds via fleet cards was illegal and unenforceable, being contrary to public policy and good morals. The counterclaim by Goosen was inadequately pleaded and did not meet the threshold for a valid claim. The defence of prescription was rejected as the claims…
Source excerpt
- Summary Judgment
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation
- Abuse Of Credit Facilities
- Illegal Agreements
- Prescription Act
- Counterclaim Requirements