Bester N.O and Others v Maas N.O and Another (2025-071547)
Bester N.O and Others v Maas N.O and Another (2025-071547) [2025] ZAGPPHC 726 (17 July 2025)
The court found that the applicants failed to provide objective evidence of ongoing dissipation of the Trust's assets and did not adequately explain the delay in launching the urgent application. The urgency was deemed self-created, as the applicants had knowledge of the Trust's identity since 2023 but only instituted urgent proceedings in 2025, despite already having pending action proceedings for the same relief. The applicants did not demonstrate that they would be unable to obtain substantial redress in due course. Consequently, the court declined to hear the matter as urgent and struck i…
Source excerpt
- Provisional Sequestration
- Urgent Application
- Impeachable Disposition
- Insolvency Act Section 26
- Locus Standi
- Lis Pendens