Nameka v S (CA&R 79/2020)
Nameka v S (CA&R 79/2020) [2020] ZAECGHC 49 (22 April 2020)
Automatic review of a stock-theft conviction was upheld as irregular: prejudicial evidence of prior convictions and incidents was led before conviction.
- Fair Trial Rights
- Inadmissible Evidence
- Previous Convictions
- Judicial Bias
- Magistrate Duties
- Fair-trial-rights