Omar v Sakoor (18659/12)
Omar v Sakoor (18659/12) [2013] ZAGPJHC 78 (9 April 2013)
The High Court dismissed an application for security for costs, holding that an incola cannot be compelled to furnish security and that access to court would be undermined.
- Security For Costs
- Rule 47
- Access To Courts
- Incola Status
- Security-for-costs
- Rule-47