Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Department of Infrastructure Development v KAWU obo Delihlazo and Others (JR331/22) [2025] ZALCJHB 316 (30 June 2025)
The Labour Court granted review, condonation and revival, and substituted an award with a finding that the employee’s dismissal was fair.
Sasol Mining (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR2279/21) [2024] ZALCJHB 436 (8 November 2024)
The Labour Court dismissed Sasol Mining’s review of a CCMA award that found the dismissal of an employee substantively unfair due to inconsistent discipline.
Chetty v Tanker Services Fuel and Gas (PTY) Ltd and Others (D1978/2018) [2022] ZALCD 43 (6 September 2022)
Review of an arbitration award upholding dismissal for gross negligence was dismissed. The court found the applicant failed to show unfair inconsistency in sanction.
Solidarity obo Motogi v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR592/18) [2020] ZALCJHB 76 (12 May 2020)
The Labour Court dismissed a review of an arbitration award upholding a dismissal for dishonesty, finding no proven inconsistency in sanction and no reviewable irregularity.
SACCAWU obo Mamuremi v Tokiso and Others (JR828/16) [2019] ZALCJHB 113 (17 May 2019)
The Labour Court dismissed a review of an arbitration award upholding a dismissal for issuing a proof of delivery before goods were delivered, finding the award reasonable.
South African Revenue Service v Sono and Others (JR 343/06) [2007] ZALC 156 (23 February 2007)
The Labour Court reviewed and set aside an arbitration award after finding that the commissioner ignored relevant evidence and relied on irrelevant considerations.
Sappi Fine Papers (Pty) Limited t/a Adamas Mill v Lallie and Others (P235/98) [1998] ZALC 117 (24 November 1998)
The Labour Court dismissed a review of a CCMA award, holding that inconsistency in sanctions was properly raised and the employer failed to rebut it.
Explore more
