Cheminais v Crane (7078/2023) [2025] ZAWCHC 183; [2025] 3 All SA 432 (WCC) (24 April 2025)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
7078/2023
Judge
W J Pretorius
The court found an orthopaedic surgeon liable for performing more extensive heel surgery than agreed, without proper justification or informed consent, causing injury and permanent disability.
S v Murphy and Others - Search and Seizure (CC27/2018) [2023] ZAWCHC 184; 2024 (1) SACR 138 (WCC) (12 July 2023)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
CC27/2018
Judge
D M Davis
The court held that the first and third searches were lawful under s 22(b) of the CPA, as the police had reasonable grounds to believe a warrant would be issued and delay would defeat the object of the search. The second search was unlawful because the consent obtained was not informed, amounting to a violation of the right to privacy, and the police officer showed ignorance and disregard for the law. The evidence from the second search was excluded as its admission would be detrimental to the administration of justice. The fourth search was unlawful because the officer who seized the drugs w…
N.C and Another v P.M.E (A398/2018) [2021] ZAGPPHC 210 (9 March 2021)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A398/2018
Judges
Ranchod, Hughes, Van der Westhuizen
Appeal in a wrongful birth medical-negligence claim dismissed; the court found no negligence in antenatal care, counselling, gestational dating, or referral decisions.
R B v Smith (211/2018) [2019] ZASCA 48; 2020 (4) SA 51 (SCA) (1 April 2019)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
211/2018
Judges
Navsa, Zondi, Dambuza, Mocumie, Mokgohloa
The Supreme Court of Appeal found that Dr Smith provided Mrs B with sufficient information regarding both laparoscopic and open hernia repair procedures, including the material risks and benefits of each. The evidence, including medical records and expert testimony, supported the conclusion that Mrs B was informed of her options and gave valid consent. The court held that the standard of care was met and that there was no negligence in the obtaining of informed consent or in the performance of the surgery. The factual findings of the trial court were confirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.
Batohi v Roux (12476/2012 ) [2018] ZAKZDHC 56; [2019] 1 All SA 390 (KZD) (16 November 2018)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Case number
12476/2012
Judge
Vahed
The High Court dismissed a medical negligence claim against a neurosurgeon, finding surgery was reasonably recommended, consent was obtained, and causation was not proved.
Watkin-Jones v Diest (2013/1518) [2018] ZAGPPHC 825 (11 October 2018)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
2013/1518
Judge
M A Makume
High Court medical negligence case about laser eye surgery and informed consent. The plaintiff’s claim was dismissed after the court found valid consent and no negligence.
N.M v Member of the Executive Council for Health KwaZulu-Natal (8432/15) [2018] ZAKZDHC 44 (28 September 2018)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Case number
8432/15
Judge
Mbatha
The court found that the plaintiff presented with multiple high-risk factors, including diabetes, morbid obesity, short stature, advanced age, and multiparity, which were not adequately managed by the defendant's staff. The hospital failed to conduct sufficient ultrasound scans, misestimated the foetal weight, and did not counsel the plaintiff regarding the risks of natural delivery or offer the option of an elective caesarean section. The delivery was traumatic, and the incorrect application of the McRoberts manoeuvre and lack of proper emergency management led to the child suffering Erb's p…