Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Intellectual Property [2007] ZASCA 24

Clipsal Australia (Pty) Ltd and Another v Trust Electrical Wholesalers and Another (125/06)

Clipsal Australia (Pty) Ltd and Another v Trust Electrical Wholesalers and Another (125/06) [2007] ZASCA 24; [2007] 4 All SA 1082 (SCA); 2009 (3) SA 292 (SCA); 2007 BIP 432 (SCA) (23 March 2007)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the High Court erred in finding that the registered design lacked novelty and originality. The court confirmed that mosaicing prior art is not permissible for assessing novelty in design law. The registered design was found to be new, as none of the prior art documents disclosed the design as a whole, and the differences identified by the respondents were insubstantial and related only to secondary features. The court clarified that originality under the Designs Act requires independent creation and not mere absence of commonality. The respondents' produc…

  • Registered Designs
  • Novelty And Originality
  • Designs Act 195 Of 1993
  • Infringement
  • Prior Art
  • Remedies For Infringement
Read case analysis
Intellectual Property [2007] ZAGPHC 82

Sunsmart Products v Moongate 130 (Pty) Ltd and Another (20162/06)

Sunsmart Products v Moongate 130 (Pty) Ltd and Another (20162/06) [2007] ZAGPHC 82; 2007 BIP 447 (T) (23 February 2007)

The High Court stayed a design revocation application pending an appeal in related infringement proceedings, finding the appeal could resolve the novelty dispute.

  • Design Registration
  • Novelty
  • Stay Of Proceedings
  • Infringement
  • Revocation Of Registration
  • Design-registration
Read case analysis
Intellectual Property [2002] ZAWCHC 18

Keith Kirsten's (PTY) Limited v Weltevrede Nursery (PTY) Limited and Another (554/2000)

Keith Kirsten's (PTY) Limited v Weltevrede Nursery (PTY) Limited and Another (554/2000) [2002] ZAWCHC 18; [2002] 3 All SA 624 (C); 2002 (4) SA 756 (C) (22 April 2002)

The High Court held that Keith Kirsten's had a valid Plant Breeders' Right in Canna Phasion, found infringement by Weltevrede Nursery, and awarded statutory damages and costs.

  • Plant Breeders Rights
  • Breeder Definition
  • Statutory Compliance
  • Damages For Infringement
  • Publication Requirements
  • Plant-breeders-rights
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.