Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAGPPHC 1166

Firstrand Bank Limited v Master of the High Court, Pretoria and Others (2022-035973)

Firstrand Bank Limited v Master of the High Court, Pretoria and Others (2022-035973) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1166 (29 September 2023)

The court found that the Master's rejection of Firstrand's claim was unlawful because the claim existed at the date of provisional sequestration, and payments made after that date could not extinguish the claim for insolvency purposes. The Master exceeded his powers by critically adjudicating the claim rather than accepting it as prima facie valid. Regarding claims 3 to 10, the court held that section 44(4) of the Insolvency Act is peremptory, and the presiding officer had no discretion to admit claims lodged late unless lateness was through no fault of the creditor, which was not established…

  • Insolvency Act Section 151 Review
  • Concursus Creditorum
  • Proof Of Claims
  • Late Lodgement Of Claims
  • Prima Facie Claims
  • Creditor Rights
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2018] ZAKZPHC 72

Applemint Properties 45 (Pty) Ltd and Others v Master of the High Court, KwaZulu-Natal Division, Pietermaritzburg and Others (13377/13)

Applemint Properties 45 (Pty) Ltd and Others v Master of the High Court, KwaZulu-Natal Division, Pietermaritzburg and Others (13377/13) [2018] ZAKZPHC 72 (21 December 2018)

The court found that the Master failed to properly apply her mind to the applicants' claims and did not invoke section 44(7) of the Insolvency Act, which would have allowed for interrogation and clarification of disputed claims. The reasons given for rejection were insufficient and did not reflect a thorough consideration of the evidence. The applicants, as persons aggrieved, had locus standi to bring the review. However, their standing to challenge the approval of the second respondent's claim depended on at least one of their claims being admitted. The court held that the decision to admit…

  • Insolvency Act Section 151 Review
  • Proof Of Claims
  • Locus Standi
  • Liquidated Vs Unliquidated Claims
  • Costs Of Review
  • Creditor Meeting Procedure
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.