Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2021] ZAFSHC 246

Van Dyk v Donnovan Theodore Majiedt Inc and Another (4070/2021)

Van Dyk v Donnovan Theodore Majiedt Inc and Another (4070/2021) [2021] ZAFSHC 246 (22 October 2021)

The court dismissed an intervening creditor’s urgent bid to reconsider a s 18(3) insolvency order, finding no locus standi and no basis for Rule 6(12)(c) relief.

  • Insolvency Act Section 18 3
  • Powers Of Provisional Trustees
  • Urgent Applications
  • Locus Standi
  • Sale Of Insolvent Assets
  • Insolvency-law
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] ZAGPJHC 306

Klein NO and Others v Levick and Others; In Re Levick and Another v Master of the High Court, Johannesburg and Others (40681/2019; 41368/2019; 526/2020; 13811/2020; 12492/2020)

Klein NO and Others v Levick and Others; In Re Levick and Another v Master of the High Court, Johannesburg and Others (40681/2019; 41368/2019; 526/2020; 13811/2020; 12492/2020) [2020] ZAGPJHC 306 (23 November 2020)

The court found that the provisional trustees had established good cause for the authority sought under s18(3) of the Insolvency Act. The trustees demonstrated urgency and reasonable grounds for opposing the review proceedings and instituting the counter application, which seeks to secure the attendance and cooperation of the witnesses at the s152 enquiry. The trustees' participation is necessary to protect the interests of the creditors, especially given the relief sought in the review applications, which could prejudice the estate. The court held that the trustees have locus standi to oppos…

  • Insolvency Act Section 18 3
  • Trustee Authority
  • Review Of Master Decisions
  • Creditor Protection
  • Judicial Oversight
  • Costs Orders
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2016] ZAGPPHC 757

Rayman and Another v Murray N.O and Another (25888/2015)

Rayman and Another v Murray N.O and Another (25888/2015) [2016] ZAGPPHC 757 (22 August 2016)

The High Court refused leave to appeal against an eviction order, finding no reasonable prospects of success and dismissing complaints about postponement and trustee substitution.

  • Leave To Appeal
  • Eviction
  • Unlawful Occupation
  • Substitution Of Trustees
  • Insolvency Act Section 18 3
  • Leave-to-appeal
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.