Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPJHC 459

Johannesburg Water (Soc) Ltd v Dark Fibre Africa (Pty) Ltd (A2023/081149)

Johannesburg Water (Soc) Ltd v Dark Fibre Africa (Pty) Ltd (A2023/081149) [2025] ZAGPJHC 459 (14 May 2025)

Johannesburg Water (SOC) Ltd is an organ of state for purposes of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act 40 of 2002 because its exclusive function is the provision of water as a basic municipal service, a constitutional function under sections 27(1)(b) and 152(1)(b) of the Constitution. The fact that its powers are derived from legislation and not directly from the Constitution does not exclude it from the Act's definition. The Magistrate erred in dismissing the special plea; section 3 notice was required, and the action must be stayed pending condonation of…

  • Institution Of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs Of State Act
  • Definition Of Organ Of State
  • Municipal Services Liability
  • Special Plea
  • Condonation Of Notice Failure
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 1222

Ramontja v Legal Aid South Africa (2021/44369)

Ramontja v Legal Aid South Africa (2021/44369) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1222 (26 November 2024)

The High Court granted condonation for late notice against Legal Aid South Africa in a professional negligence claim arising from alleged failure to advise on appeal rights.

  • Condonation
  • Prescription Act Section 12 3
  • Institution Of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs Of State Act
  • Professional Negligence
  • Late-notice
  • Organ-of-state
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAMPMBHC 30

Minister of Police v Sibuyi and Another (A52 / 2021)

Minister of Police v Sibuyi and Another (A52 / 2021) [2022] ZAMPMBHC 30 (12 May 2022)

The High Court upheld an appeal and granted rescission of a default judgment after finding the court a quo wrongly treated wilful default as required under Rule 49(8).

  • Rescission Of Judgment
  • Wilful Default
  • State Liability Act
  • Institution Of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs Of State Act
  • Condonation
  • Default Judgment
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.