Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAKZDHC 22

Arbee N.O and Others v Bryte Insurance Company Ltd (D13804/2023)

Arbee N.O and Others v Bryte Insurance Company Ltd (D13804/2023) [2025] ZAKZDHC 22 (16 April 2025)

The court dismissed an application to compel further particulars in an insurance dispute, holding that Uniform rule 21(4), not rule 30A, governed the request.

  • Uniform Rule 21
  • Uniform Rule 30a
  • Insurance Claims
  • Pleadings And Particulars
  • Costs Orders
  • Uniform-rule-21
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 884

Basdeo and Another v Discovery Life Limited (056880/23)

Basdeo and Another v Discovery Life Limited (056880/23) [2024] ZAGPPHC 884 (10 September 2024)

The High Court granted summary judgment for interest and attorney-and-client costs, finding the insurer’s deferment pending police investigation was not a bona fide defence.

  • Summary Judgment
  • Insurance Claims
  • Deferment Of Payment
  • Punitive Costs
  • Prescribed Rate Of Interest
  • Summary-judgment
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2021] ZAGPJHC 899

S v Ndlovu (SS72/2019)

S v Ndlovu (SS72/2019) [2021] ZAGPJHC 899 (22 October 2021)

The High Court convicted Rosemary Nomia Ndlovu on murder, fraud, defeating the ends of justice, incitement and attempted murder counts arising from insurance-linked killings.

  • Murder
  • Attempted Murder
  • Fraud
  • Insurance Claims
  • Defeating Ends Of Justice
  • Incitement
Read case analysis
Alternative Dispute Resolution [2020] ZAGPJHC 60

Triton Pharmacare Corporate Ltd v Green and Another (2019/20464)

Triton Pharmacare Corporate Ltd v Green and Another (2019/20464) [2020] ZAGPJHC 60 (28 February 2020)

The court found that the arbitrator, Mr Green, did not disregard the amount of R3 647 304.31 as alleged by Triton. The amount was considered in the award and factored into the calculation of Triton's indemnity. Even if the arbitrator had erred, such an error would not constitute exceeding his powers under section 33(1)(b) of the Arbitration Act. The application was found to be unfounded and vexatious, particularly as it unjustifiably impugned the integrity of the arbitrator. The court dismissed the application and awarded punitive costs against Triton.

  • Arbitration Review
  • Exceeding Powers
  • Gross Irregularity
  • Insurance Claims
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2019] ZAGPJHC 443

Branco v S (A86/2016)

Branco v S (A86/2016) [2019] ZAGPJHC 443 (31 October 2019)

The High Court dismissed an appeal against conviction for fraud arising from an allegedly false insurance claim after a BMW was reported stolen.

  • Fraud
  • Criminal Appeal Procedure
  • Insurance Claims
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Credibility Of Witnesses
  • Insurance-claims
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAKZDHC 23

Chard v Old Mutual Insure Limited (A66/2017)

Chard v Old Mutual Insure Limited (A66/2017) [2019] ZAKZDHC 23; [2020] 1 All SA 381 (KZD) (30 September 2019)

The court found that Old Mutual had not satisfied the requirements for invoking litigation privilege over the expert reports and correspondence. The evidence did not establish that the reports were obtained for the definite purpose of obtaining legal advice in circumstances where litigation was likely or reasonably anticipated. The initial involvement of Old Mutual was cooperative, and litigation was not contemplated until much later. The respondent failed to demonstrate the necessary intention or linkage to legal advice at the relevant time. Accordingly, the applicant was entitled to the dis…

  • Litigation Privilege
  • Disclosure Of Documents
  • Insurance Claims
  • Expert Evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2018] ZAECGHC 101

Xego and Another v The State (CA&R30/2016)

Xego and Another v The State (CA&R30/2016) [2018] ZAECGHC 101 (11 October 2018)

Criminal appeal in a fraud and insurance-claims case. Convictions were upheld, but the sentence on the main fraud count was reduced from 15 to 8 years.

  • Fraud
  • Common Purpose
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Administration Of Justice
  • Insurance Claims
Read case analysis
Admiralty And Maritime [2015] ZAWCHC 172

Owners And Parties who bear risk in and to the Pontoon 'Margaret' and the Cargo of two Floating Docks and Twelve Barges v MT 'Salvaliant' (Application to Compel) (AC81/2009, AC144/2010)

Owners And Parties who bear risk in and to the Pontoon 'Margaret' and the Cargo of two Floating Docks and Twelve Barges v MT 'Salvaliant' (Application to Compel) (AC81/2009, AC144/2010) [2015] ZAWCHC 172 (16 November 2015)

Admiralty application to compel further particulars. The court ordered limited particulars on agreements with the municipality, but refused most other requests.

  • Request For Further Particulars
  • Loss Of Profits
  • Insurance Claims
  • Locus Standi
  • Quantification Of Damages
  • Admiralty-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2015] ZAGPJHC 246

Glencarol (Pty) Limited and Others v Emerald Risk Transfer Limited and Others (2014/40878)

Glencarol (Pty) Limited and Others v Emerald Risk Transfer Limited and Others (2014/40878) [2015] ZAGPJHC 246 (27 October 2015)

The High Court dismissed an exception to amended particulars of claim, holding that an alleged repudiation pleading was irrelevant and caused no prejudice.

  • Exception Procedure
  • Pleading Requirements
  • Specific Performance
  • Repudiation Of Contract
  • Vague And Embarrassing
  • Insurance Claims
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2014] ZAGPJHC 191

Klencovljevic v Discovery Life Limited (46154/2013 , 46155/2013)

Klencovljevic v Discovery Life Limited (46154/2013 , 46155/2013) [2014] ZAGPJHC 191 (18 August 2014)

The court found that the respondent insurer failed to assess the applicant's claims within a reasonable time and did not establish any legal basis for indefinite deferral pending third party investigations. The respondent did not conduct its own investigation or make any election to repudiate or honour the policies during the six month period following claim submission. The court held that the insurer's right to a reasonable time to assess claims does not entitle it to postpone assessment indefinitely in the hope that external investigations might yield relevant information. Furthermore, the…

  • Insurance Claims
  • Material Non Disclosure
  • Reasonable Time To Assess
  • Policy Repudiation
  • Duty Of Disclosure
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.