Norman Luxury Tours (Pty) Ltd v Stalker Hutchingson Admiral (Pty) Ltd (6616/2022) [2025] ZALMPPHC 104 (30 May 2025)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
6616/2022
Judge
M Mangena
The High Court dismissed an exception to a plea in an insurance dispute, holding the plea was not vague or embarrassing and could be answered as pleaded.
Tshipu v Bryte Insurance Company Limited and Another (056972/2024) [2025] ZAGPPHC 81 (31 January 2025)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
056972/2024
Judge
L.A. Retief
The High Court dismissed an insured’s claim for the retail value of a stolen vehicle because he failed to prove compliance with the policy’s tracker requirement.
Ngobeni v PSG Insure and Others (14433/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1158 (5 October 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
14433/2022
Judge
Collis
The High Court dismissed an application to set aside an insurance repudiation and an ombudsman ruling, finding misjoinder, no CPA basis, and no PAJA review.
Global Aviation Investments Pty Limited v Ingosstrakh (2015/32049) [2024] ZAGPJHC 979 (26 September 2024)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2015/32049
Judge
S Van Nieuwenhuizen
The court held that Ingosstrakh’s purported plea to Claim B was invalid because it was filed while under bar, and allowed default judgment to be sought.
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the respondent failed to prove the quantum of his insurance claim as pleaded, because his evidence did not match the pleaded market-value basis.
Alexandra Forbes v Cingo (A94/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1833 (24 October 2023)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A94/2022
Judges
Botsi-Thulare, Collis, Lenyai
The appeal court found that the appellant provided a reasonable and acceptable explanation for its default, which was not wilful or grossly negligent but resulted from an administrative change during a merger and acquisition process. The appellant was unaware of the summons due to the change in the claims handler's email address and took prompt steps to seek rescission upon learning of the default judgment. The court held that the appellant's defences were bona fide and had a prima facie basis, entitling it to an opportunity to be heard. The requirements for rescission under rule 31(2)(b) and…
Alexander Forbes Insurance Insurance Company Limited v Cingo (40210/20) [2021] ZAGPPHC 897 (14 June 2021)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
40210/20
Judge
Mkansi
The High Court dismissed an insurer’s rescission application, finding no adequate explanation for default and no bona fide defence with prospects of success.
Legent Motors (Pty) Ltd v Oakhurst Insurance Company Ltd (EL33/2020) [2021] ZAECELLC 5 (23 March 2021)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, East London Local Court
Case number
EL33/2020
Judge
J.E. Smith
The court dismissed an exception to a plea in an insurance dispute, finding the defendant’s special pleas on jurisdiction and locus standi were clear and properly pleaded.