Mobile Telephone Networks (Pty) Ltd t/a MTN v Hughes, Chisholm ANd Airey Incorporated and Another (3104/2014)
Mobile Telephone Networks (Pty) Ltd t/a MTN v Hughes, Chisholm ANd Airey Incorporated and Another (3104/2014) [2015] ZAECMHC 57 (8 May 2015)
The court found that the defendants failed to provide sufficient reasons for a postponement and did not demonstrate prejudice or bona fide grounds for delay. The plaintiff's affidavit complied with Rule 32(2), as the deponent swore positively to the facts and verified the cause of action and amount claimed. The defendants' alleged defences were vague, unsupported by material facts, and did not constitute a valid defence to the claim. The plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment for the outstanding amount, interest, and costs.
Source excerpt
- Summary Judgment
- Trust Account Liability
- Fraud
- Negligence
- Attorneys Act Section 78
- Interest On Deposit