Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2009] ZAGPPHC 339

S V Mnisi (Rh138/2005, A453/09)

S V Mnisi (Rh138/2005, A453/09) [2009] ZAGPPHC 339 (27 May 2009)

The High Court refused a premature special review of incomplete criminal proceedings and remitted the rape case to the trial court for finalization.

  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 304
  • Review Jurisdiction
  • Intermediary Application
  • Recusal Of Magistrate
  • Criminal-procedure
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Constitutional law

Director of Public Prosecutions Transvaal v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others; Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others v Director of Public Prosecutions Transvaal (Centre for Child Law; Childline South Africa; Resources aimed at the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect; Operation Bobbi Bear; Children First; People Opposing Women Abuse; Cape Mental Health Society as Amici Curiae)

The invalidated provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act, properly construed in light of section 28(2) of the Constitution, are not inconsistent with the Constitution. The High Court’s declaration of invalidity and its further declaratory, mandatory and supervisory orders were therefore set aside. Because the core child-protection concern lay in implementation rather than invalidity, the Court issued a limited information-producing supervisory order to assess availability of intermediaries and child-friendly facilities.

  • Child complainants in sexual offence cases
  • Intermediaries
  • Closed circuit television
  • In camera proceedings
  • Oath and affirmation
  • Constitutional invalidity
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2008] ZAGPHC 148

S v Mokoena, S v Phaswane (CC7/07, CC192/07)

S v Mokoena, S v Phaswane (CC7/07, CC192/07) [2008] ZAGPHC 148; 2008 (2) SACR 216 (T); 2008 (5) SA 578 (T) (12 May 2008)

The court held that the current statutory framework and procedures governing child victims and witnesses in criminal trials are unconstitutional to the extent that they fail to give effect to the paramountcy of children's interests as required by section 28(2) of the Constitution. Discretionary provisions regarding the appointment of intermediaries, exclusion of the public, and use of electronic devices for testimony do not adequately protect children from secondary trauma, alienation, and systemic delays. The court declared sections 170A(1), 153(3) and (5), 158(5), and the proviso to 164(1)…

  • Child Witnesses
  • Criminal Procedure Act
  • Section 28 Constitution
  • Intermediaries
  • Closed Court Proceedings
  • Speedy Trial
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.