Kupa v Economic Freedom Fighters and Others (39/2018)
Kupa v Economic Freedom Fighters and Others (39/2018) [2019] ZAECGHC 109 (15 October 2019)
The court held that the order of the court a quo was not appealable as it did not have an immediate and substantial effect, nor did it cause serious, immediate, ongoing, or irreparable harm. The reinstatement and suspension of expulsion were temporary measures pending the outcome of the applicant's appeal, and no finding was made on the merits of the appeal. The interpretation of the party's Code supported the applicant's entitlement to procedural rights, and the first respondent acted prematurely by not affording her a hearing in terms of Clause D.25. The grounds raised by the respondent reg…
Source excerpt
- Leave To Appeal
- Internal Party Discipline
- Interpretation Of Party Code
- Vacation Of Office
- Municipal Structures Act