Hart v Hart and Others (2453/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 381; [2025] 1 All SA 373 (WCC); 2025 (3) SA 286 (WCC) (20 November 2024)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
2453/2024
Judge
Mapoma
The court held that a widow under a special bequest could insist on selling the property and reinvesting the proceeds, subject only to the executors’ approval of the investment.
Willemse v Cronje and Others (7608/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 270 (18 September 2024)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
7608/2023
Judge
Ralarala
The court found that the applicant's pre-emptive right was triggered by the receipt of the offer to purchase the farm properties, not by the conclusion of the sale agreement. The applicant was entitled to exercise his right by stepping into the position of the third party purchaser, but only on the same terms as those offered to the third respondent, including the sale of movables and improvements. The court held that the structure of the sale agreements was commercially reasonable and not designed to frustrate the applicant's rights. The lease agreement was entered into by the usufructuary,…
Moodley v James and Others (D6046/2023) [2023] ZAKZDHC 92 (4 December 2023)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Case number
D6046/2023
Judge
Hlatshwayo AJ
The court found that the joint will, when properly construed as a whole, clearly expresses the testators’ intention that their estates be bequeathed to an inter vivos trust for the benefit of the applicant. Clause 3 and clause 4 are the dominant clauses and must be given full effect. The first respondent’s interpretation, which would result in partial intestacy, is contrary to the plain meaning of the will and would render the testators’ wishes redundant. The first respondent has no discretion to refuse to create the trust, and her continued delay is unlawful. The counter-application for a de…
Strauss v Strauss and Others (2020/2236) [2023] ZAGPJHC 377 (24 April 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2020/2236
Judge
Moorcroft
The court interpreted a mutual will using an Endumeni-style unitary approach, held that the will did not create massing, and gave effect to specific bequests and residue provisions.
Noome and Others v Botha N.O. and Others (4405/2021) [2022] ZAFSHC 108 (23 May 2022)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
4405/2021
Judge
Opperman
The court held that trustees could not sell a farm specifically bequeathed in a will, declared the sale invalid, and ordered costs against the respondents.
Dube v Ndlovu and Others (20/13909) [2022] ZAGPJHC 37 (25 January 2022)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
20/13909
Judge
Flatela
The court found that the 2014 will expressly revoked all previous wills and codicils, including the 2011 will, as evidenced by its clear language and revocation clause. The applicant's argument that the silence of the 2014 will on the Kagiso Property meant the 2011 will should prevail was rejected. The court held that the testator's intention, as reflected in the 2014 will, was to exclude the applicant as a beneficiary and to treat the Kagiso Property as part of the residue of the estate. The principles of freedom of testation and the requirement to give effect to the testator's last wishes w…