Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 39

Motus Group Limited v North Motor Group (Pty) Ltd`s Kia Bryanston Motor Dealership and Another (LM012Apr21)

Motus Group Limited v North Motor Group (Pty) Ltd`s Kia Bryanston Motor Dealership and Another (LM012Apr21) [2021] ZACT 39 (7 June 2021)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Motus Group’s merger with two North Motor Group dealership businesses, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Intra Brand Competition
  • Public Interest
  • Section 197 Transfer
  • Large-merger
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 28

Motus Group Ltd v Atlantis Nissan Centurion (LM069Jul20)

Motus Group Ltd v Atlantis Nissan Centurion (LM069Jul20) [2020] ZACT 28 (13 October 2020)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Motus Group Ltd’s acquisition of the Atlantis Nissan Centurion dealership, finding no substantial competition or employment concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Public Interest Employment
  • Intra Brand Competition
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2008] ZACT 22

Vodacom Service Provider Company (Pty) Ltd v Global Telematics South Africa (Pty) Ltd (12/LM/Jan08)

Vodacom Service Provider Company (Pty) Ltd v Global Telematics South Africa (Pty) Ltd (12/LM/Jan08) [2008] ZACT 22; [2008] 1 CPLR 185 (CT) (8 April 2008)

The Tribunal unconditionally approved Vodacom’s acquisition of GTSA’s subscriber base, finding no substantial lessening of competition despite criticism of withheld documents.

  • Merger Clearance
  • Vertical Integration
  • Intra Brand Competition
  • Disclosure Obligations
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Merger-clearance
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2006] ZACT 72

Vodacom Services Provider Company (Pty) Ltd / Vodacom Properties No.2 (Pty) Ltd and Africell Cellular Services (Pty) Ltd (48/LM/Jun06)

Vodacom Services Provider Company (Pty) Ltd / Vodacom Properties No.2 (Pty) Ltd and Africell Cellular Services (Pty) Ltd (48/LM/Jun06) [2006] ZACT 72 (23 August 2006)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Vodacom’s merger with Africell, finding no substantial lessening of competition, foreclosure, or employment harm.

  • Merger Control
  • Vertical Integration
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Intra Brand Competition
  • Public Interest Employment
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2004] ZACT 21

Vodacom Group (Pty) Ltd and Smartphone SP (Pty) Ltd t/a as Smartcall (68/LM/Dec03)

Vodacom Group (Pty) Ltd and Smartphone SP (Pty) Ltd t/a as Smartcall (68/LM/Dec03) [2004] ZACT 21; [2004] 1 CPLR 186 (CT) (19 March 2004)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Vodacom’s acquisition of 51% of Smartcall, finding no substantial lessening of competition or adverse employment impact.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Vertical Integration
  • Intra Brand Competition
  • Service Provider Market
  • Public Interest Employment
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2002] ZACT 66

Sandown Motor Holdings (Pty) Ltd and McCarthy Limited Others (33/LM/May02)

Sandown Motor Holdings (Pty) Ltd and McCarthy Limited Others (33/LM/May02) [2002] ZACT 66 (19 November 2002)

The Competition Tribunal approved six related motor dealer mergers under DaimlerChrysler South Africa’s dealer network strategy, finding no substantial lessening of competition.

  • Dealer Network Strategy
  • Horizontal Merger
  • Intra Brand Competition
  • Inter Brand Competition
  • Franchise Agreements
  • Market Power
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.