Maite v Borman Duma Zitha Attorneys (42064/2017)
Maite v Borman Duma Zitha Attorneys (42064/2017) [2025] ZAGPJHC 183 (18 February 2025)
The plaintiff was briefed by the defendant for each invoice and performed the required legal work. The invoices for individual claimant RAF matters (A1 to A26) were not subject to any specific condition of taxation or assessment, and the defendant did not dispute or challenge them prior to litigation. The applicable payment terms were governed by the Pretoria Bar Council Rules, requiring payment unless disputed and subject to a 60-day period. The defendant's plea did not raise assessment or taxation as a defence, and no evidence was presented to substantiate claims of unreasonableness or fict…
Source excerpt
- Professional Fees
- Road Accident Fund
- Service Agreement
- Invoice Payment
- Reasonableness Of Fees