Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2002] ZALAC 9

NUMSA v Lumex Clipsal (Pty) Ltd (JA51/2000)

NUMSA v Lumex Clipsal (Pty) Ltd (JA51/2000) [2002] ZALAC 9; [2002] 6 BLLR 511 (LAC) (19 April 2002)

Court
Labour Appeal Court
Case number
JA51/2000
Judges
M.T.R. Mogoeng, R.M.M. Zondo, D. van Reenen

The Labour Appeal Court held that employees who undertook to work a six-day/three-shift system were bound by the integrated two-machines-per-operator requirement.

  • Dismissal For Refusal To Work
  • Job Description Dispute
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Retrenchment
  • Unprotected Strike Action
  • Labour-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.