Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2021] ZAGPPHC 45

Summer Season Trading 63 (Pty) Ltd v City of Tshwane metropolitan Municipality and Others (22557/2015)

Summer Season Trading 63 (Pty) Ltd v City of Tshwane metropolitan Municipality and Others (22557/2015) [2021] ZAGPPHC 45 (1 February 2021)

Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
22557/2015
Judge
Basson

The court allowed an amendment to a review application so the applicant could challenge a later expropriation notice involving the same property and parties.

  • Expropriation Act
  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Amendment Of Pleadings
  • Joinder Of Causes Of Action
  • Interests Of Justice
  • Amendment-of-pleadings
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2018] ZAGPPHC 788

Asande Developers CC v Toro ya Africa Consultants (Pty) Ltd and Another (800/2012)

Asande Developers CC v Toro ya Africa Consultants (Pty) Ltd and Another (800/2012) [2018] ZAGPPHC 788 (14 September 2018)

Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
800/2012
Judge
F J Erasmus

The High Court ordered separate trials for a claim and counterclaim involving Asande, postponing those issues from Toro’s claim against Truzanne.

  • Separation Of Trials
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Joinder Of Causes Of Action
  • Rule 10 Uniform Rules
  • Exception Procedure
  • Separation-of-trials
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2018] ZAGPPHC 678

Asande Developers CC v Toro Ya Africa Consultants (PTY) LTD and Another (800/2012)

Asande Developers CC v Toro Ya Africa Consultants (PTY) LTD and Another (800/2012) [2018] ZAGPPHC 678 (14 September 2018)

Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
800/2012
Judge
F Erasmus

The court found that the claims against Asande Developers CC and Truzanne Property Developers (PTY) LTD are based on distinct causes of action, with no joint liability sought. The only alleged link between the claims was insufficient to justify a joint trial, as it would force defendants to participate in proceedings largely irrelevant to them. The liquidation of Truzanne does not render the application moot, as Toro's claim against Truzanne has not been formally withdrawn or admitted, and other legal possibilities remain. The interests of Asande in having its counterclaim adjudicated, the co…

Source excerpt

  • Separation Of Trials
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Joinder Of Causes Of Action
  • Rule 10 Uniform Rules
  • Costs Award
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.