Maree and Another v Bobroff and Another (2016/32219)
Maree and Another v Bobroff and Another (2016/32219) [2017] ZAGPJHC 116 (7 March 2017)
The court found that there was a sufficiently substantial coincidence of interests between the respondents to justify their joinder in the sequestration application. The applicants established a prima facie claim for provisional sequestration, showing that the respondents are jointly and severally liable for debts arising from settlement agreements made orders of court, by operation of section 19(3) of the Companies Act and section 23 of the Attorneys Act. The respondents' departure from South Africa, liquidation of assets, and absence were found to be acts of insolvency under section 8(a) of…
Source excerpt
- Provisional Sequestration
- Personal Liability Company
- Act Of Insolvency
- Creditor Advantage
- Joinder Of Debtors