Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2024] ZALMPPHC 97

Mabotwane Security Services CC and Others v Sekhukhune District Municipality and Others (4291/2023)

Mabotwane Security Services CC and Others v Sekhukhune District Municipality and Others (4291/2023) [2024] ZALMPPHC 97 (20 August 2024)

The court found that the acting municipal manager's decision to appoint the third respondent for all four clusters contravened the clear terms of the tender, which required four preferred service providers, one per cluster. The empowering provision did not permit a single bidder to be appointed for all clusters. The supply chain management policy did not authorize the acting municipal manager to deviate from the Bid Adjudication Committee's recommendations; the only permissible action was to refer the matter back for reconsideration. Both committees had recommended four different entities, an…

  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Municipal Supply Chain Management
  • Judicial Review Of Tender Awards
  • Exhaustion Of Internal Remedies
  • Separation Of Powers
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2007] ZAGPHC 59

Abagibeli Insurance Administrators (Pty) Ltd v SA Rail Commuter Corp LTD and Others (17184/06)

Abagibeli Insurance Administrators (Pty) Ltd v SA Rail Commuter Corp LTD and Others (17184/06) [2007] ZAGPHC 59 (23 May 2007)

The court found that the tender process complied with the requirements of section 217 of the Constitution and the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act. The first respondent considered all relevant criteria, including price, empowerment status, and claims management capability. The applicant's criticisms regarding procedural unfairness, preferential treatment, and lack of transparency were unfounded. The court held that the waiver of the requirements in the letter of 8 March 2006 applied to all tenderers and did not disadvantage the applicant. The difference in price between the appli…

  • Public Procurement
  • Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act
  • Judicial Review Of Tender Awards
  • Section 217 Constitution
  • Claims Management Services
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.