NEHAWU obo Ngomane v Department of Employment and Labour and Others (JR 2482/19)
NEHAWU obo Ngomane v Department of Employment and Labour and Others (JR 2482/19) [2023] ZALCJHB 174; [2023] 9 BLLR 964 (LC) (8 June 2023)
The court found that the second respondent failed to properly consider all relevant circumstances in refusing reinstatement. The decision focused narrowly on whether the applicant was absent for a calendar month, disregarding mitigating evidence such as the traditional healer's certificate and the applicant's return to work. The respondents did not evaluate less restrictive measures or the proportionality of dismissal, nor did they reflect on alternatives or the applicant's health. The refusal to reinstate was thus irrational and arbitrary, warranting review and setting aside of the decision.
Source excerpt
- Public Service Act
- Deemed Dismissal
- Reinstatement
- Irrationality Review
- Jurisdictional Precondition