Dreyer v Afristat Investment Holdings (030942/22) [2024] ZAGPPHC 142 (20 February 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
030942/22
Judge
G Ally
The High Court dismissed a minority shareholder’s bid to wind up a company under section 81 of the Companies Act, finding no proof of fraud or asset wastage.
Van Der Westhuizen v Van Der Westhuizen and Others (24614/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 15 (8 January 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
24614/2022
Judge
Nyathi
The court found that the relationship between the applicant and first respondent, both brothers and members of the close corporations, had irretrievably broken down, resulting in a deadlock that rendered the corporations incapable of functioning as intended. The respondents failed to provide any substantive legal defence to counter the application. The court considered the broad discretion afforded under the just and equitable ground for winding up, as well as the clean hands principle, and determined that the circumstances justified final liquidation of both Trackstar Trading 20 CC and HM &…
Tait NO and Another v Wescom Business Ventures (Pty) Ltd and Others, Tait NO and Others v Van Niekerk and Other (29833/2016, 2495/2016) [2018] ZAGPPHC 639 (2 March 2018)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
29833/2016, 2495/2016
Judge
A A Crutchfield
The court dismissed an application to wind up a solvent company over shareholder deadlock, enforced a settlement agreement, and made detailed costs orders.
Unipalm Investment Holdings Ltd v BTH Konstruksie BK (14425/2007) [2008] ZAWCHC 96 (6 November 2008)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
14425/2007
Judge
Davis
The High Court confirmed liquidation of a close corporation after finding the applicant was a creditor, the denials were unsupported, and winding up was just and equitable.