Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2023] ZAGPPHC 447

National Consumer Commission v Scoop Clothing CC and Another

National Consumer Commission v Scoop Clothing CC and Another [2023] ZAGPPHC 447; A269/2021 (15 June 2023)

Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A269/2021
Judges
C J van der Westhuizen, M D Botsi-Thulare

The court held that the Compliance Notice issued by the appellant complied with the statutory requirements of the Consumer Protection Act and its regulations. The Tribunal erred in cancelling and modifying the Compliance Notice, as the Act does not permit leniency or modification for non-compliance. The Tribunal acted beyond its authority by granting orders not permitted by the Act. The procedure followed by the appellant was lawful under section 3(5) of PAJA, which allows for a fair procedure prescribed by the empowering Act. The application to intervene by SACTWU was refused, as its submiss…

Source excerpt

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Compliance Notice
  • Import Regulation
  • Labelling Requirements
  • Review Of Administrative Action
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2022] ZANCT 67

National Consumer Commission v Stonehill International (Pty) Ltd (NCT-233199-2022-73(2)(b))

National Consumer Commission v Stonehill International (Pty) Ltd (NCT-233199-2022-73(2)(b)) [2022] ZANCT 67 (25 November 2022)

Court
National Consumer Tribunal
Case number
NCT-233199-2022-73(2)(b)
Judges
K Moodaliyar, C Sassman, A Potwana

The Tribunal found that the Respondent did not contravene section 24(5) of the CPA or regulation 6 of the CPA Regulations. The goods in question were unfinished textile fabric intended for further manufacturing, and the required trade description and country of origin were reflected in commercial documents accompanying the goods, which is permissible under section 24(1)(b) of the CPA. The Tribunal held that care labelling requirements apply only to finished products offered to consumers, not to raw materials. The Tribunal adopted a purposive interpretation of the CPA, emphasizing that the pur…

Source excerpt

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Labelling Requirements
  • Trade Description
  • Statutory Interpretation
  • Prohibited Conduct
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2021] ZANCT 39

Scoop Clothing CC v National Consumer Commission (NCT/178145/2021/101(1))

Scoop Clothing CC v National Consumer Commission (NCT/178145/2021/101(1)) [2021] ZANCT 39 (3 September 2021)

Court
National Consumer Tribunal
Case number
NCT/178145/2021/101(1)
Judges
P A Beck, T Woker, F Manamela

The Tribunal found that the compliance notice issued by the National Consumer Commission was fatally defective due to the absence of a proper investigation, as required by section 73(1) of the Consumer Protection Act. The Respondent failed to provide evidence of an investigation or the investigator's report, rendering the administrative action unlawful and procedurally unfair under PAJA. The Tribunal held that the Applicant should be afforded an opportunity to rectify the labelling defects while the goods remain under customs control, in line with the purpose of a compliance notice and princi…

Source excerpt

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Compliance Notice Review
  • Procedural Fairness
  • Import Regulation
  • Labelling Requirements
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.