B.A.M v A.M (21530/2009)
B.A.M v A.M (21530/2009) [2014] ZAGPPHC 70 (28 February 2014)
The High Court held that the applicant’s Rule 43(6) maintenance application had lapsed for late service, and ordered the applicant to pay the costs.
- Maintenance Post Divorce
- Rule 43 Applications
- Costs Award
- Lapse Of Interim Orders
- Family-law
- Maintenance