Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2016] ZASCA 164

Wishart and Others v BHP Billiton Coal South Africa (Pty) Limited and Others (162/2016)

Wishart and Others v BHP Billiton Coal South Africa (Pty) Limited and Others (162/2016) [2016] ZASCA 164; [2017] 1 All SA 90 (SCA); 2017 (4) SA 152 (SCA) (16 November 2016)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that section 44(1) of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 applies to the proof of claims in the winding-up of companies under the Companies Act 61 of 1973, including the time period for proof and the possibility of late proof with leave of the Master or the court. The provisions of section 366 of the Companies Act are complementary and do not exclude section 44(1). The first exception to the appellants' particulars of claim was therefore wrongly upheld and must be dismissed. Regarding expungement of claims, the court found that the power to expunge a claim is confer…

  • Winding Up Of Companies
  • Proof Of Claims
  • Expungement Of Claims
  • Late Proof Of Claims
  • Master's Powers
  • Exceptions To Pleadings
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2014] ZAGPJHC 301

De Montlehu v Mayo N.O and Others (42552/2012)

De Montlehu v Mayo N.O and Others (42552/2012) [2014] ZAGPJHC 301; 2015 (3) SA 253 (GJ) (30 April 2014)

The court held that the proviso to section 44(1) of the Insolvency Act applies to the late proof of claims in company liquidation proceedings. Starspan Investments lodged its claim almost five months after the second meeting of creditors without seeking leave from the Master or the Court, and without payment of any sum as directed for late proof. The Master's decision to admit the claim was based on an incorrect interpretation of the law, specifically the reliance on the Stone & Stewart judgment, which the court found to be clearly wrong. The statutory requirement in section 44(1) is perempto…

  • Companies Act Liquidation
  • Insolvency Act Proof Of Claims
  • Late Proof Of Claims
  • Review Of Master Decision
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.