Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Delict [2018] ZAECGHC 73

Grobbelaar v P.K (4962/2017)

Grobbelaar v P.K (4962/2017) [2018] ZAECGHC 73 (21 August 2018)

Leave to appeal was dismissed in a dog-bite delict case involving actio de pauperie, provocation, and a minor child’s presence on a boundary wall.

  • Actio De Pauperie
  • Doli Incapax
  • Provocation By Victim
  • Lawful Presence
  • Trespass By Minor
  • Actio-de-pauperie
Read case analysis
Delict [2018] ZAECGHC 38

Kohl v Grobbelaar (4962/2017)

Kohl v Grobbelaar (4962/2017) [2018] ZAECGHC 38 (22 May 2018)

The court found that Reece, being under 10 years old, was doli et culpae incapax and could not be held culpable for trespass or provocation. The defendant failed to prove that Reece's conduct constituted provocation sufficient to exclude liability under actio de pauperie, as merely sitting on the boundary wall did not amount to substantial negligence or imprudence. The dog acted contra naturam by attacking a child who had not provoked it. Regarding lawful presence, the court held that Reece's position on the wall did not render him unlawfully present, especially given his incapacity and the l…

  • Actio De Pauperie
  • Strict Liability For Domestic Animals
  • Doli Incapax
  • Provocation Defence
  • Lawful Presence
  • Child Trespass
Read case analysis
Delict [2013] ZAGPJHC 394

Cole v Pieterse N.O (11599/12)

Cole v Pieterse N.O (11599/12) [2013] ZAGPJHC 394 (7 October 2013)

The court found that the plaintiff was aware her unannounced entry would provoke the dogs, as they always barked and rushed at visitors. The plaintiff was not expressly prohibited from entering, but her conduct in entering without knocking was considered rude and unacceptable. The evidence did not establish that Saartjie acted contra naturam sui generis; rather, her behaviour was consistent with her breed and territorial instincts. The defendant discharged the onus of showing that the plaintiff voluntarily accepted the risk and that the dog was provoked. The plaintiff failed to prove, on a ba…

  • Actio De Pauperie
  • Liability For Domesticated Animals
  • Provocation
  • Lawful Presence
  • Contra Naturam Sui Generis
Read case analysis
Delict [2007] ZAWCHC 17

Fourie v Naranjo and Another (A41/2007)

Fourie v Naranjo and Another (A41/2007) [2007] ZAWCHC 17; [2007] 4 All SA 1152 (C); 2008 (1) SA 192 (C) (2 May 2007)

The High Court dismissed an appeal in a dog-bite delict case, confirming actio de pauperie liability and rejecting defences of volenti, negligence, and unlawful presence.

  • Actio De Pauperie
  • Strict Liability
  • Volenti Non Fit Iniuria
  • Emotional Shock
  • Negligence
  • Lawful Presence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.