Raedene v Minister of Police and Another (1624/2020)
Raedene v Minister of Police and Another (1624/2020) [2024] ZALMPTHC 28 (15 April 2024)
The court held that the respondents' decision to classify the applicant's resignation as a dishonourable discharge and to refuse payment of capped leave was not administrative action within the meaning of PAJA, as it arose from the employment relationship and was governed by the Labour Relations Act and the relevant collective agreement. The High Court's jurisdiction was not engaged, as the matter fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Labour Court. The constitutional challenges to the National Instruction provisions failed, as the alleged infringements either did not apply (presumptio…
Source excerpt
- Collective Agreements
- Dishonourable Discharge
- Leave Gratuity
- Jurisdiction Of High Court
- Constitutional Invalidity
- Doctrine Of Avoidance