Clinton v Limpopo Provincial Legal Council (2659/2020) [2025] ZALMPPHC 99 (15 May 2025)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
2659/2020
Judge
Mathabathe
The court found that the applicant failed to establish any legal basis for review or setting aside of the respondent's decision. The appointment of Mr. Reddy as investigator was lawful under Rule 50 of the Legal Practice Council Rules, which allows the Board to appoint any qualified person for inspection of accounting records. The applicant's reliance on Rule 38.4 was misplaced, as it pertains to investigation committees, not inspections of trust accounts. The respondent's resolution to suspend the applicant and refer the matter to court did not constitute administrative action under PAJA, as…
Potelwa v South African Legal Practice Council and Others (5029/2024) [2025] ZAWCHC 188 (2 May 2025)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
5029/2024
Judges
R Allie, CM Fortuin
The court found that the Disciplinary Committee of the LPC acted irregularly by determining both guilt and sanction at the same hearing without notifying the applicant of her right to present evidence and argument in mitigation. This procedural irregularity violated the applicant's rights under PAJA and section 34 of the Constitution. The DC's failure to inform the applicant of her right to appeal and to present mitigation before imposing sanctions deprived her of a material right. The court held that the sanctions imposed on 13 December 2023 must be set aside and referred back to a newly con…
South African Legal Practice Council v Rencken (Reasons) (24020/2024) [2025] ZAWCHC 71 (14 February 2025)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
24020/2024
Judge
Van Zyl
The High Court refused to suspend an attorney pending discipline, finding no prima facie case of intentional misappropriation and no immediate public-risk basis.
South African Legal Practical Council v Louw and Others (2023/068293) [2024] ZAGPJHC 959; 2025 (1) SA 447 (GJ) (30 September 2024)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2023/068293
Judges
S D J Wilson, Sutherland DJP
The High Court dismissed the LPC’s striking-off application, holding that a disciplinary inquiry was needed because the facts and individual culpability were not adequately established.
South African Legal Practice Council v Berkowitz and Another (35116/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 836 (15 August 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
35116/2022
Judges
Brand, Mbongwe
The court held that the LPC was entitled, under its common law authority and section 44 of the Legal Practice Act, to approach the High Court for disciplinary relief without first concluding its own disciplinary hearing. The charges against Berkowitz—practicing for own account without a Fidelity Fund certificate for multiple periods, failing to submit auditor's reports, failing to pay membership fees, failing to cooperate with the LPC and the court, and wilful non-compliance with court orders—were proven on the papers. Berkowitz failed to place a proper version before the court, refused to fi…
South African Legal Practice Council v Mabena and Another (B306/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 593 (13 May 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
B306/2023
Judges
Flatela, C J Van der Westhuizen
The court struck an attorney from the roll after finding he misused trust funds in fraudulent property transactions, failed to keep records, and did not cooperate with a curator.
Mokhele and Another v South African Legal Practice Council (5511/2022) [2023] ZAFSHC 94 (27 March 2023)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
5511/2022
Judges
C Reinders, AS Boonzaaier
The High Court refused leave to appeal against an interim suspension order against attorney Lebohang Michael Mokhele and his firm, finding no appealable order or reasonable prospects of success.
South African Legal Practice Council v Mokhele (5511/2022) [2023] ZAFSHC 80 (17 March 2023)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
5511/2022
Judge
JP Daffue
The High Court held an attorney in contempt for practising despite an interim suspension order, and granted a suspended one-month committal order with costs.