Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 302

Dayanand-Jugroop v Ngento (2022/23261)

Dayanand-Jugroop v Ngento (2022/23261) [2024] ZAGPJHC 302 (20 March 2024)

The High Court granted an advocate’s claim for unpaid professional fees, rejecting the respondent’s procedural objections and untimely challenge to the charges.

  • Professional Fees
  • Legal Practitioners Liability
  • Reasonableness Of Fees
  • Jurisdiction
  • Lis Pendens
  • Fee Dispute Resolution
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZASCA 112

Limpopo Provincial Council of the South African Legal Practice Council v Chueu Incorporated Attorneys and Others (459/22)

Limpopo Provincial Council of the South African Legal Practice Council v Chueu Incorporated Attorneys and Others (459/22) [2023] ZASCA 112 (26 July 2023)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that all directors of a law firm have a fiduciary duty and are jointly and severally liable for the firm's debts and liabilities, including misappropriation of trust funds, as per section 34(7) of the Legal Practice Act. Ignorance of financial matters does not absolve directors from liability or disciplinary consequences. The respondents' defence that they were 'salaried directors' or uninvolved in finances was rejected, as such a concept is not recognised in the Companies Act or the Legal Practice Act. The Court found that the requirements for interim suspens…

  • Legal Practitioners Liability
  • Fiduciary Duties Of Directors
  • Misappropriation Of Trust Funds
  • Interim Suspension
  • Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Legal Practice Act
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2021] ZAGPJHC 163

Solomon and Another v Junkeeparsad (37003/2019; 37456/2019)

Solomon and Another v Junkeeparsad (37003/2019; 37456/2019) [2021] ZAGPJHC 163; 2022 (3) SA 526 (GJ) (2 September 2021)

The court held that, following the Legal Practice Act and the Code of Conduct, an attorney who instructs an advocate is personally liable for the advocate's reasonable fees, regardless of whether the attorney acts through an incorporated firm. The Code of Conduct now codifies this liability as a rule of law, not merely a professional practice or trade usage. The respondent, having instructed the applicants in his professional capacity, is liable to pay their reasonable charges, and the applicants are entitled to sue him personally without needing to sue the incorporated firm. The allegations…

  • Legal Practitioners Liability
  • Advocate Fees
  • Legal Practice Act
  • Code Of Conduct
  • Privity Of Contract
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.