Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Kojana v Road Accident Fund (EL482/2021) [2022] ZAECELLC 3 (8 February 2022)
The court separated liability from quantum in a Road Accident Fund claim, found the Fund 100% liable on the plaintiff’s unchallenged evidence, and postponed quantum.
Phohu v Road Accident Fund (44691/2017) [2019] ZAGPPHC 533 (16 October 2019)
The High Court held the Road Accident Fund liable after accepting the plaintiff’s version of a rear-end collision by an unidentified vehicle and rejecting material parts of the defence challenge.
Mbokane v Road Accident Fund (2188/17) [2019] ZAGPPHC 7 (31 January 2019)
The court held the Road Accident Fund 100% liable after finding the insured driver caused a collision by turning right into the plaintiff’s path at an unsafe moment.
Van Rhyn v Road Accident Fund (4784/2016) [2018] ZAFSHC 112 (25 June 2018)
The High Court held the Road Accident Fund liable for 100% of the plaintiff’s proven damages after finding his version of the collision credible.
Bambela and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions (7179/2014) [2018] ZAGPPHC 518 (26 January 2018)
The High Court held the National Director of Public Prosecutions liable for malicious prosecution after finding no reasonable cause and malice in persisting with the case.
Sekhoto v RAF (3898/ 2016) [2017] ZAGPPHC 1171 (5 September 2017)
The court held the Road Accident Fund liable after finding the insured driver negligent when a truck lurched and the plaintiff was crushed by its load bin.
Van Rooyen N.O. OBO Viljoen v Road Accident Fund (2016/41654) [2017] ZAGPPHC 256 (1 June 2017)
The High Court held the Road Accident Fund 100% liable after finding the plaintiff proved that the insured driver’s negligence caused the motorcycle collision.
Van Rooyen N.O. v Road Accident Fund (2016/41654) [2017] ZAGPPHC 237 (1 June 2017)
High Court Road Accident Fund liability trial: the court found the insured driver 100% liable after preferring the plaintiff’s version on probabilities.
Matsenjwa v Road Accident Fund (2011/22051) [2012] ZAGPJHC 238 (29 November 2012)
The High Court held the Road Accident Fund liable after a pedestrian was struck by an unidentified vehicle while returning to his parked car with warning triangles in place.
Explore more
