Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2024] ZASCA 123

Mfana Ignitius Kubai v S (923/2023)

Mfana Ignitius Kubai v S (923/2023) [2024] ZASCA 123; 2024 (2) SACR 595 (SCA) (30 August 2024)

The Supreme Court of Appeal set aside a 15-year sentence for rhino poaching, holding that the high court misdirected itself and that 9 years was appropriate.

  • Illegal Hunting
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Endangered Species Protection
  • Limpopo Environmental Management Act
  • Forfeiture Of Property
  • Criminal-sentencing
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2023] ZALMPPHC 83

Voorburg Safaris and Game Breeders (Pty) Ltd v MEC for the Limpopo Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism and Others (1412/2023)

Voorburg Safaris and Game Breeders (Pty) Ltd v MEC for the Limpopo Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism and Others (1412/2023) [2023] ZALMPPHC 83 (8 September 2023)

The High Court dismissed a review over a P3-exemption permit, holding that the applicant lacked locus standi and that the 2012 trust resolution remained valid.

  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Limpopo Environmental Management Act
  • Internal Remedies Exhaustion
  • Locus Standi
  • Nature Reserve Permits
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] ZALMPTHC 1

Kubai and Another v S (CC14/2019)

Kubai and Another v S (CC14/2019) [2023] ZALMPTHC 1; 2023 (2) SACR 196 (LT) (27 January 2023)

The appellate court found that the trial court erred by not sentencing the appellant in accordance with the penalty clause under section 117(1)(a) of the Limpopo Environmental Management Act, which prescribes a maximum of 15 years' imprisonment for hunting specially protected wild animals. The appellant's personal circumstances, including being a first offender and breadwinner, did not outweigh the aggravating factors: his prior involvement in rhino poaching, knowledge of the crime, and the seriousness of the offence. Rhino poaching is a national crisis with severe ecological and societal imp…

  • Illegal Hunting
  • Limpopo Environmental Management Act
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Protected Species
  • Aggravating Circumstances
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2020] ZALMPPHC 34

Hlungwane v S (BA 21/2019; RC121/2014)

Hlungwane v S (BA 21/2019; RC121/2014) [2020] ZALMPPHC 34 (4 June 2020)

The High Court upheld an appeal against conviction for possession of rhino legs, finding the evidence did not prove joint possession or the required intent.

  • Joint Possession
  • Common Purpose
  • Protected Species Offences
  • Animus Possidendi
  • National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act
  • Limpopo Environmental Management Act
Read case analysis
Environmental Law [2017] ZASCA 117

Els v S (1241/2016)

Els v S (1241/2016) [2017] ZASCA 117; 2017 (2) SACR 622 (SCA) (22 September 2017)

The Supreme Court of Appeal reduced a sentence for unlawful possession and conveyance of rhino horns, finding the trial court had misdirected itself.

  • Unlawful Possession Of Rhino Horns
  • Limpopo Environmental Management Act
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Wildlife Conservation
  • Sentencing-principles
  • Wildlife-conservation
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2015] ZAGPPHC 86

Tlou and Others v S (A25/2015)

Tlou and Others v S (A25/2015) [2015] ZAGPPHC 86 (13 February 2015)

Bail appeal in a rhino-poaching prosecution. The High Court dismissed the appeal for four accused but granted bail to the fifth, finding the case against him weak.

  • Bail Application
  • Limpopo Environmental Management Act
  • Schedule 5 Offences
  • Admissibility Of Hearsay
  • Rhino Poaching
  • Bail-application
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2012] ZAGPPHC 216

S v Sebone (A627/2012)

S v Sebone (A627/2012) [2012] ZAGPPHC 216 (4 September 2012)

The High Court set aside a conviction after finding the accused had been charged under the wrong section of the Limpopo Environmental Management Act.

  • Limpopo Environmental Management Act
  • Protected Species Offences
  • Incorrect Charge
  • Conviction Set Aside
  • Wrong-charge
  • Conviction-set-aside
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.