Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAGPJHC 1126

Bidvest Bank Limited v Waste Partner Investments (Pty) Ltd (55825/2021)

Bidvest Bank Limited v Waste Partner Investments (Pty) Ltd (55825/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1126 (5 October 2023)

Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
55825/2021
Judge
Vally

The court held that there is no absolute rule prohibiting the joinder of multiple respondents in a single application for liquidation or sequestration. The authorities, including Breetveldt, Ferela, and Business Partners, were analysed, with the court favouring a flexible and pragmatic approach that serves the interests of justice. Where debtors are sued on the same debt and their defences are identical, a single application is not only permissible but preferable to avoid duplication, conflicting judgments, and unnecessary costs. The applicant's procedural choice to bring separate application…

Source excerpt

  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Costs Awards
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Liquidation And Sequestration
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZANCHC 48

Taljaard and Another v Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa and Others (1094/2022)

Taljaard and Another v Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa and Others (1094/2022) [2022] ZANCHC 48 (15 August 2022)

Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
1094/2022
Judge
Mamosebo

The court found that the Rule 30 application brought by the applicants to set aside the Land Bank's counter-application lacked merit. The urgency and national importance of the matter, including the interests of major creditors, provisional liquidators, farmers, and farm labourers, justified the expedited hearing of the counter-application. The procedural objections raised by the applicants were insufficient to delay the matter, and the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the Rule 30 application. The admission of TLU SA as amicus curiae was deferred to allow proper submissions in line w…

Source excerpt

  • Business Rescue Proceedings
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Constitutional Validity Of Companies Act
  • Rule 30 Irregular Proceedings
  • Amicus Curiae Admission
  • Liquidation And Sequestration
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.