D[....] v B[....] and Others (23664/2017)
D[....] v B[....] and Others (23664/2017) [2021] ZAGPPHC 212 (30 March 2021)
The court found that the plaintiff and first defendant were in a relationship akin to husband and wife, and that the plaintiff made substantial financial and labour contributions to the businesses and assets managed by the first defendant. The evidence established that both parties intended to build and accumulate assets for their joint benefit, and that the plaintiff was not merely an employee but a partner in a universal partnership. The court accepted that the partnership was tacitly formed through conduct and mutual intention, and that the assets and businesses operated by the first defen…
Source excerpt
- Universal Partnership
- Cohabitation
- Division Of Assets
- Undue Enrichment
- Liquidation Of Partnership
- Trust Litigation