Peta Attorneys v Provision Research and Events CC and Another (2019/40177)
Peta Attorneys v Provision Research and Events CC and Another (2019/40177) [2020] ZAGPJHC 418 (23 December 2020)
The court found that the applicant's training outline was not a mere reproduction of government regulations but included additional subjects and reflected the skill, knowledge, and expertise of Ms Peta. The outline was used by the respondents in their marketing material, demonstrating its value and originality. The applicant provided sufficient evidence of the labour and skill expended in creating the work. The court held that the training outline constituted an original literary work within the meaning of the Copyright Act and that all requirements for a final interdict were met. The respond…
Source excerpt
- Copyright Infringement
- Originality Requirement
- Final Interdict
- Literary Work Definition