Pasadena Leather Products CC t/a Pasadena Products and Another v Resca and Another (137/2016)
Pasadena Leather Products CC t/a Pasadena Products and Another v Resca and Another (137/2016) [2016] ZASCA 204; 2016 BIP 63 (SCA) (15 December 2016)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a swivel holster did not infringe a patent for a lockable holster because it lacked the patent’s second camming surface.
- Patent Infringement
- Purposive Construction
- Essential Integers
- Lockable Holster
- Patents Act Interpretation
- Patent-infringement