Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Delict [2025] ZAGPPHC 706

S.P v Road Accident Fund (26723/2021)

S.P v Road Accident Fund (26723/2021) [2025] ZAGPPHC 706 (24 June 2025)

The court found that the plaintiff's injuries—a healed fracture of the left humerus and an unspecified head injury—did not justify the quantum claimed. The expert evidence did not demonstrate ongoing pain, disability, or loss of amenities of life. Comparisons to previous cases were not on all fours with the plaintiff's circumstances, and the plaintiff failed to provide up-to-date or supplementary expert reports substantiating his claim. The court exercised its discretion and determined that R350,000 constitutes just compensation for general damages in this matter.

  • General Damages
  • Road Accident Claim
  • Pain And Suffering
  • Loss Of Amenities Of Life
Read case analysis
Delict [2024] ZANWHC 37

M.R v Mokgethi N.O and Another (393/2015)

M.R v Mokgethi N.O and Another (393/2015) [2024] ZANWHC 37 (16 February 2024)

The court awarded damages after finding the plaintiff was assaulted and raped by an off-duty police officer, and confirmed vicarious liability and quantum.

  • Vicarious Liability
  • Rape
  • Quantum Of Damages
  • Pain And Suffering
  • Loss Of Amenities Of Life
  • Contumelia
Read case analysis
Delict [2023] ZAFSHC 314

Kuku v Road Accident Fund (232/2015)

Kuku v Road Accident Fund (232/2015) [2023] ZAFSHC 314 (11 August 2023)

The court found that the plaintiff sustained serious injuries in the motor vehicle accident, including skull and facial fractures, cervical vertebrae fracture, and traumatic brain injury, resulting in ongoing pain, cognitive deficits, and inability to work. Expert medical evidence confirmed the severity and long-term impact of the injuries. The court considered comparable case law and the parties' submissions, noting that the quantification of general damages is discretionary and guided by fairness and precedent. The court determined that an award of R1,400,000.00 for general damages is just…

  • Road Accident Fund Act
  • General Damages
  • Serious Injury Assessment
  • Pain And Suffering
  • Loss Of Amenities Of Life
Read case analysis
Delict [2023] ZAGPJHC 679

Burger (curator ad litem obo Minor) v Road Accident Fund (32688/2018)

Burger (curator ad litem obo Minor) v Road Accident Fund (32688/2018) [2023] ZAGPJHC 679 (9 June 2023)

The High Court awarded R2.5 million in general damages to a minor injured in a motor vehicle accident, finding severe permanent harm and loss of amenities of life.

  • Road Accident Fund Act
  • General Damages
  • Quantification Of Damages
  • Curator Ad Litem
  • Loss Of Amenities Of Life
  • Road-accident-fund
Read case analysis
Delict [2017] ZAGPPHC 1202

Masemola v RAF (53419/2014)

Masemola v RAF (53419/2014) [2017] ZAGPPHC 1202 (3 April 2017)

High Court award of R850,000 general damages after a road accident, with costs limited to one trial day because of unnecessary argument over a neck injury.

  • Road Accident Fund
  • General Damages
  • Assessment Of Comparable Awards
  • Pain And Suffering
  • Loss Of Amenities Of Life
  • Road-accident-fund
Read case analysis
Delict [2015] ZAGPPHC 31

Ramolobeng v Lowveld Bus Services (Pty) Ltd and Another (29836/09)

Ramolobeng v Lowveld Bus Services (Pty) Ltd and Another (29836/09) [2015] ZAGPPHC 31 (3 February 2015)

The court awarded R550,000 in general damages for severe collision injuries, including chronic spinal pain, erectile dysfunction, depression, and unemployability.

  • General Damages
  • Pain And Suffering
  • Loss Of Amenities Of Life
  • Erectile Dysfunction
  • Unemployability
  • General-damages
Read case analysis
Delict [1988] ZASCA 21

Administrator General for South-West Africa and Others v Kriel (414/86)

Administrator General for South-West Africa and Others v Kriel (414/86) [1988] ZASCA 21; [1988] 2 All SA 323 (A) (24 March 1988)

The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the trial court materially misdirected itself by treating the awards for para-medical aids and general damages as entirely distinct, resulting in improper duplication. The court held that many of the para-medical aids awarded to Marie were intended to ameliorate her pain and loss of amenities of life, and thus must be considered when assessing general damages. The court concluded that, after making due allowance for the amelioration provided by these aids, the award for general damages should be reduced. The court also identified and corrected an arithme…

  • Quantum Of Damages
  • Personal Injury
  • Duplication Of Awards
  • Loss Of Amenities Of Life
  • Pain And Suffering
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.