Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 31

Nedbank Limited v Abrahams (2023-003529; 2023-031890 ; 2023-053164; 2023-051021; ; 2023-039182; 2023-039212;)

Nedbank Limited v Abrahams (2023-003529; 2023-031890 ; 2023-053164; 2023-051021; ; 2023-039182; 2023-039212;) [2024] ZAGPJHC 31; 2025 (2) SA 545 (GJ) (12 January 2024)

Section 127(8)(a) of the National Credit Act, by necessary implication, confers exclusive jurisdiction on magistrates' courts for claims to recover shortfalls after voluntary surrender of goods under credit agreements. The phrase 'in terms of the Magistrates' Courts Act' is not superfluous; it serves to exclude the High Court's jurisdiction for these matters. The High Court's jurisdiction is not preserved by general statutory language elsewhere in the Act, and the specific wording in section 127(8)(a) demonstrates a deliberate legislative choice to mandate proceedings in the magistrates' cour…

  • National Credit Act
  • Magistrates Courts Jurisdiction
  • Voluntary Surrender
  • Shortfall Claims
  • Exclusive Jurisdiction
  • Statutory Interpretation
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2017] ZAWCHC 143

S v Permall (171172)

S v Permall (171172) [2017] ZAWCHC 143; 2018 (2) SACR 206 (WCC) (8 December 2017)

High Court review of a magistrate’s sentence in a drunk-driving matter, holding that the alternative imprisonment term was miscalculated under the fines legislation.

  • Driving Under Influence
  • Sentencing Discretion
  • Adjustment Of Fines Act
  • Magistrates Courts Jurisdiction
  • Sentencing-review
  • Impaired-driving
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2014] ZAECGHC 2

S v Maties and S v Pieterse (130050, 130048)

S v Maties and S v Pieterse (130050, 130048) [2014] ZAECGHC 2 (23 October 2013)

The High Court reduced heavy sentences for organised stock theft, finding the trial court failed to properly consider the cumulative effect of the punishments.

  • Stock Theft
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Cumulative Sentences
  • Magistrates Courts Jurisdiction
  • Mitigating And Aggravating Factors
  • Stock-theft
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.