G.J.W v L.W (2023-114308)
G.J.W v L.W (2023-114308) [2024] ZAGPPHC 823 (8 August 2024)
The court found that the applicant failed to establish a case for confirmation of the interim anti-dissipation order. The respondent's intentions regarding the net proceeds of the Mooikloof property were consistent and focused on the children's education, with the balance available for accrual claims. There was no evidence of an intention to dissipate assets to defeat the applicant's claim. The respondent has sufficient assets to meet any accrual claim, and the applicant's fear of dissipation was unfounded. The interim order was overbroad, as the applicant's accrual claim at the time was limi…
Source excerpt
- Accrual System
- Anti Dissipation Interdict
- Divorce Proceedings
- Forfeiture Of Accrual
- Maintenance And Education
- Interim Relief