Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family And Children [2025] ZAWCHC 335

P.N v D.N (10481/2018)

P.N v D.N (10481/2018) [2025] ZAWCHC 335 (6 August 2025)

The High Court granted divorce, refused forfeiture of benefits, and ordered an equal division of the joint estate after finding the plaintiff's gambling was not proven to be substantial misconduct.

  • Divorce Act Section 9
  • Forfeiture Of Benefits
  • Division Of Joint Estate
  • Parental Rights And Responsibilities
  • Maintenance Of Minor Child
  • Forfeiture-of-benefits
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2025] ZAGPPHC 253

T.J.M v K.J.M and Another (11409/2022)

T.J.M v K.J.M and Another (11409/2022) [2025] ZAGPPHC 253 (3 March 2025)

A divorce judgment granted the decree of divorce, made the parties’ settlement agreement an order of court, and ordered forfeiture of pension and property benefits.

  • Divorce Forfeiture
  • Pension Interest
  • Division Of Joint Estate
  • Maintenance Of Minor Child
  • Divorce-forfeiture
  • Pension-interest
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2024] ZALMPPHC 69

T.S.S v M.A.S - Appeal (HCA04/2023)

T.S.S v M.A.S - Appeal (HCA04/2023) [2024] ZALMPPHC 69 (22 July 2024)

Appeal over forfeiture of a spouse’s share of pension interest in divorce proceedings dismissed; the court found no basis to disturb the trial court’s discretion.

  • Divorce Act Section 9
  • Forfeiture Of Patrimonial Benefits
  • Division Of Pension Interest
  • Irretrievable Breakdown Of Marriage
  • Maintenance Of Minor Child
  • Divorce-act-section-9
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2024] ZALMPPHC 10

A.R.S (born K) v M.S.S (2427/2021)

A.R.S (born K) v M.S.S (2427/2021) [2024] ZALMPPHC 10 (30 January 2024)

The court found that the defendant contributed to the joint estate in accordance with his income and circumstances, and the plaintiff failed to prove substantial misconduct or infidelity sufficient to justify forfeiture. The duration of the marriage, the parties' respective ages, and the lack of evidence of undue benefit weighed against granting forfeiture. The maintenance amount for the minor child was undisputed and reasonable. Parental responsibilities and rights were allocated to ensure both parties retained guardianship, with the plaintiff awarded daily care and residence, and the defend…

  • Divorce
  • Forfeiture Of Benefits
  • Maintenance Of Minor Child
  • Pension Interest
  • Parental Responsibilities
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2023] ZAFSHC 68

V.R v V.R (4939/2020)

V.R v V.R (4939/2020) [2023] ZAFSHC 68 (1 March 2023)

High Court divorce matter: the plaintiff forfeited marital benefits, child maintenance was set at R7,000 per month, and parental responsibilities were allocated.

  • Forfeiture Of Benefits
  • Maintenance Of Minor Child
  • Division Of Joint Estate
  • Parental Rights And Responsibilities
  • Forfeiture-of-benefits
  • Child-maintenance
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2022] ZAWCHC 74

A.V.W v S.V.W and Others (3118/2021)

A.V.W v S.V.W and Others (3118/2021) [2022] ZAWCHC 74 (20 April 2022)

The court found that the first defendant raised bona fide disputes regarding the adequacy of maintenance for the minor child, the enforceability of the consent paper, and the validity of the waiver of spousal maintenance. The court emphasized its statutory duty under the Divorce Act to ensure maintenance arrangements for minor children are satisfactory and that settlement agreements in divorce matters are subject to judicial scrutiny. Given the lack of evidence to determine whether the agreement served the best interests of the minor child and the unresolved issues regarding trust property an…

  • Divorce Act
  • Maintenance Of Minor Child
  • Spousal Maintenance
  • Settlement Agreement Enforceability
  • Waiver Of Maintenance
  • Trust Property In Divorce
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2020] ZAFSHC 44

P.I.L v P.E.L (5345/2017)

P.I.L v P.E.L (5345/2017) [2020] ZAFSHC 44 (27 February 2020)

Divorce judgment on child maintenance, pension-interest sharing, and forfeiture. The court fixed maintenance at R2,500 monthly and awarded the plaintiff 50% of the defendant’s pension interest.

  • Maintenance Of Minor Child
  • Division Of Joint Estate
  • Pension Interest Sharing
  • Forfeiture Of Benefits
  • Costs In Divorce
  • Community Of Property
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2019] ZAGPPHC 976

L.P.M v M.E.B (14649/2019)

L.P.M v M.E.B (14649/2019) [2019] ZAGPPHC 976 (18 November 2019)

The High Court referred a customary-marriage dispute to oral evidence, dismissed most of the application, reserved costs, and left interim child contact and care orders in place.

  • Customary Marriage
  • Parental Rights And Responsibilities
  • Property Division
  • Maintenance Of Minor Child
  • Customary-marriage
  • Oral-evidence
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2019] ZAGPPHC 352

L v L (26758/2014)

L v L (26758/2014) [2019] ZAGPPHC 352 (3 July 2019)

The High Court corrected an incomplete divorce order, granting the decree of divorce and ancillary child-maintenance and parental-responsibility relief.

  • Divorce Act Section 9
  • Forfeiture Of Matrimonial Benefits
  • Variation Of Court Order
  • Maintenance Of Minor Child
  • Parental Rights And Responsibilities
  • Rule-42
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2018] ZALMPPHC 62

D.R.M v D.M.K (2017/2016)

D.R.M v D.M.K (2017/2016) [2018] ZALMPPHC 62 (7 November 2018)

The court found that, despite the payment of lobola, there was no formal handing over of the Defendant to the Plaintiff or his family, as required by customary law and practice. The evidence of the Plaintiff and his witnesses was preferred over that of the Defendant and her witnesses, who failed to establish that the handing over occurred. The court held that the handing over of the bride is an essential requirement for a valid customary marriage, distinguishing marriage from mere cohabitation. Without this, no valid customary marriage exists between the parties. The Defendant's claims for ma…

  • Recognition Of Customary Marriages Act
  • Validity Of Customary Marriage
  • Handing Over Of Bride
  • Lobola Payment
  • Maintenance Of Minor Child
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.