Mccarthy Ltd t/a Mccarthy Toyota Sinoville v Malekane (A563/2008)
Mccarthy Ltd t/a Mccarthy Toyota Sinoville v Malekane (A563/2008) [2012] ZAGPPHC 42 (22 February 2012)
The court found that the respondent failed to prove that the vehicle delivered was not new or that the alleged defects were sufficiently serious to justify cancellation of the contract. The evidence showed only a minor scratch, which was repaired, and other complaints were either vague, easily remedied, or not indicative of a second-hand vehicle. The respondent's evidence was inconsistent and lacked credibility, while the appellant's version was more probable. The breach, if any, was not serious enough to warrant cancellation and repayment of the deposit. Therefore, the magistrates' court err…
Source excerpt
- Contract Cancellation
- Sale Of Goods
- Malperformance
- Deposit Repayment