Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2022] ZAWCHC 174

S v Kwaza and Others (CC68/2018)

S v Kwaza and Others (CC68/2018) [2022] ZAWCHC 174; 2023 (1) SACR 335 (WCC) (6 September 2022)

Leave to appeal was refused on conviction, but granted on sentence only for the life terms imposed on accused 2, 3 and 4.

  • Murder
  • Joint Possession Of Firearm
  • Common Purpose
  • Pre Sentence Detention
  • Mandatory Sentences
  • Leave To Appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1991] ZASCA 55

S v Mabizela and Another (500/90)

S v Mabizela and Another (500/90) [1991] ZASCA 55 (21 May 1991)

The court held that, following legislative amendments, the death sentence for murder is no longer mandatory and must only be imposed if it is the only proper sentence. In the case of first appellant, the court found that although he participated fully in the planned armed robbery, there was insufficient evidence that he knew the firearms were loaded or that he subjectively foresaw a high risk of death. His previous convictions and role in the crime were aggravating, but the mitigating factors outweighed the need for the death penalty, making a lengthy term of imprisonment appropriate. For sec…

  • Sentencing Discretion
  • Death Penalty
  • Mitigating And Aggravating Factors
  • Dolus Eventualis
  • Mandatory Sentences
  • Retrospective Application
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1990] ZASCA 38

S v Toms; S v Bruce (139/89, 289/89)

S v Toms; S v Bruce (139/89, 289/89) [1990] ZASCA 38; 1990 (2) SA 802 (AD); [1990] 2 All SA 248 (A) (30 March 1990)

The majority of the court held that section 126A(1)(a) of the Defence Act does not prescribe a mandatory sentence of imprisonment. The phrase 'liable to' in the section denotes a susceptibility to the prescribed maximum sentence, not a compulsory imposition of that sentence. The absence of the words 'not exceeding' does not, in itself, signify a mandatory sentence, and the legislature did not use clear language to indicate such intent. The court emphasized the importance of judicial discretion and individualization in sentencing, and found that the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act per…

  • Sentencing Discretion
  • Mandatory Sentences
  • Statutory Interpretation
  • Defence Act
  • Conscientious Objection
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.