Twende Africa Group (Pty) Ltd t.a TAG Marine v Qavak; Fisherman Fresh CC v Twende Africa Group (Pty) Ltd t.a TAG Marine (AC216/2018) [2018] ZAECPEHC 20; [2018] 2 All SA 576 (ECP) (20 February 2018)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
Case number
AC216/2018
Judge
G G Goosen
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient urgency due to the commercial prejudice caused by the arrest of the vessel, justifying truncated time periods for the application. On the merits, the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie contractual claim against the applicant, as the evidence did not support the existence of a tacit or implied agreement obliging the applicant to pay commission. The plaintiff's alternative delictual claim for unlawful interference was also not prima facie established, as the necessary elements, including actual loss and a legal duty, were n…
Central Bridge Trading 333 CC v Extreme Motion Marketing CC; In re: Extreme Motion Marketing CC v Central Bridge Trading 333 CC (A18075/16) [2017] ZAGPJHC 334 (17 June 2017)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
A18075/16
Judge
P.A. Meyer
The High Court set aside the arrest of chrome concentrate, holding that goods become cargo under Admiralty law only once brought onto the vessel.
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Shark Team skipper was not negligent when a freak wave capsized the vessel and dismissed the widow’s damages claim.
Big Red One Incorporated and Another v Macro Fishing (Pty) Ltd (033/06) [2006] ZASCA 87; 2006 (6) SA 309 (SCA) (1 June 2006)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
033/06
Judges
Scott, Streicher, Farlam, Mthiyane, Nugent
The Supreme Court of Appeal upheld a sale pendente lite of the MV Spirit of Namibia, finding the attachment covered a maritime claim and the agreement did not bar sale.