Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2014] ZAGPPHC 590

Pilanesberg Platinum Mines (Pty) Ltd v Chief Director: Mineral Regulations, Department of Mineral Resources and Others (61752/2013)

Pilanesberg Platinum Mines (Pty) Ltd v Chief Director: Mineral Regulations, Department of Mineral Resources and Others (61752/2013) [2014] ZAGPPHC 590 (29 July 2014)

The court found that the First Respondent acted ultra vires by imposing conditions requiring financial provision for rehabilitation based on the original EMP after approving amendments to the closure objectives. The conditions were not rationally connected to the information before the First Respondent, nor to the reasons given, and failed to consider relevant expert evidence supporting the feasibility of the amended closure objectives. The First Respondent's reliance on a worst-case scenario was unsupported and unreasonable. The statutory framework requires financial provision to be made in…

  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Mineral And Petroleum Resources Development Act
  • Environmental Management Programme
  • Mine Closure Liability
  • Ultra Vires Decision
  • Financial Provision For Rehabilitation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.