L.M.T v Matodzi Neluhleni Attorneys and Others (038394/2025)
L.M.T v Matodzi Neluhleni Attorneys and Others (038394/2025) [2025] ZAGPJHC 356 (26 March 2025)
The court found that the urgent application was an abuse of process, as the applicant's attorney had received a written undertaking from the respondents that the funds would be paid, eliminating any genuine urgency. The attorney persisted with the application despite this assurance and attempted to manufacture urgency based on the applicant's personal circumstances, which had alternative avenues of redress. The conduct of the attorney materially deviated from professional standards, warranting a punitive costs order de bonis propriis on an attorney and client scale in favour of the first and…
Source excerpt
- Costs De Bonis Propriis
- Abuse Of Urgent Court
- Attorney And Client Costs
- Misconduct By Legal Practitioner