Rodel Finance Services (Pty) Ltd v Attorneys Fidelity Fund (16833/2007)
Rodel Finance Services (Pty) Ltd v Attorneys Fidelity Fund (16833/2007) [2010] ZAWCHC 407 (24 May 2010)
The High Court held that Rodel had not “entrusted” money to an attorney under section 26 of the Attorneys’ Act, so the Fidelity Fund claim failed.
- Attorneys Fidelity Fund
- Entrustment
- Pecuniary Loss
- Mortgage Bond Fraud
- Attorneys-fidelity-fund
- Trust-account