Yosana v Director of Public Prosecutions, Western Cape (CC40/2020) [2025] ZAWCHC 263 (20 June 2025)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
CC40/2020
Judge
C.N. Nziweni
Second bail application based on alleged new facts dismissed. The Court held that a witness recantation, banking hardship, and trial delay did not justify release.
Tshivenga v S - Appeal (2248/2023) [2023] ZAFSHC 327 (17 August 2023)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
2248/2023
Judge
P. J. Loubser
The Free State High Court dismissed leave to appeal against a bail refusal, holding that the alleged new facts did not amount to exceptional circumstances.
Yanta v S (CC44/2021) [2023] ZAWCHC 45; 2023 (2) SACR 387 (WCC) (1 March 2023)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
CC44/2021
Judge
De Wet
The court found that while certain new facts and changed circumstances were present—specifically, the withdrawal of pending cases, the applicant's prolonged detention, and his medical condition—these did not cumulatively amount to exceptional circumstances justifying release on bail for schedule 6 offences. The seriousness of the charges, the strength of the State's case, and the applicant's prior conduct, including providing false information and allegedly committing offences while on bail, outweighed the new facts presented. The interests of justice required continued detention, and the app…
Terblanche v S (CA&R 05/2022) [2022] ZAECQBHC 36 (4 October 2022)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Gqeberha
Case number
CA&R 05/2022
Judges
M. S. Rugunanan, V. Noncembu
The court found that the magistrate erred in applying a restrictive dictionary definition of 'new facts' and failed to appreciate that evidence previously unavailable to the appellant, such as affidavits from individuals he believed to be state witnesses and electronic evidence retrieved from his cellphone, constituted new facts. The change in circumstances that made such evidence accessible after the first bail application is what qualifies them as new facts. The court held that the appellant should be afforded the opportunity to present this evidence in support of his renewed bail applicati…
Porritt v S (SS40/2006) [2018] ZAGPJHC 45 (2 March 2018)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
SS40/2006
Judge
RE Monama
The court found that the applicant's bail application was barred by the doctrine of lis pendes, as there was a pending application for special leave to appeal before the Supreme Court of Appeal concerning the same subject matter and parties. The applicant's attempt to circumvent this by relying on alleged new facts was deemed a stratagem to delay the trial and an abuse of process. The court held that the interests of justice and the need for orderliness required that the pending appeal be adjudicated first. The applicant's conduct was found to be vexatious, and the application for bail was re…