Chess South Africa and Others v Chess South Africa and Others (A5067/2019)
Chess South Africa and Others v Chess South Africa and Others (A5067/2019) [2022] ZAGPJHC 317 (10 May 2022)
The Court found that the respondents were not absent in the sense required by Rule 6(12)(c) because they had received notice of the application and the relief sought was explicit and could be anticipated. Their decision not to oppose or attend the hearing, despite logistical and financial constraints, did not entitle them to rescission of the order. The Siwendu J order was properly implemented, the AGM and elections were valid, and the respondents' exclusion was a consequence of their failure to regularise their standing as required by the Chess SA report and the court order. The Court below…
Source excerpt
- Rescission Of Judgment
- Urgent Application
- Corporate Governance
- Notice And Absence
- Interdict
- Rule 6 12 C